NSG3101 ASSESSMENT 4 – VIDEO ANALYSIS & CASE STUDY REPORT MARKING GUIDE
OFFICIAL Holmesglen: SQ BNurs 11-May-2022 \ad.holmesglen.edu.auholmesglenStaff-FDIRsquirk2DesktopNSG 3101Ass 4 Case study report Rubric.docx
RUBRIC CRITERIA | HIGH DISTINCTION 5 marks |
DISTINCTION 4 marks |
CREDIT 3 marks |
PASS 2.5 marks |
FAIL 0 -2 marks |
WEIGHTING |
Criteria 1 INTRODUCTION Introduces the topic under discussion, defines person centred care and outlines the direction of the report. |
Excellent introduction of the topic under discussion, succinct definition of person centred care and detailed outline of the direction of the report |
Very good introduction of the topic under discussion, clear definition of person centred care and clear outline of the direction of the report |
Good introduction of the topic under discussion, adequate definition of person-centred care and adequate outline of the direction of the report |
Basic introduction of the topic under discussion, basic definition of person-centred care lacking some clarity and brief outline of the direction of the report |
There is no defined introduction the topic under discussion, no or unclear definition of person-centred care and no outline of the direction of the report |
/5 |
Criteria 2 BODY Uses the video analysis of “Betty’s story” and further research to provide a detailed outline of early stage and end stage renal disease including symptoms, symptom management, treatments, multidisciplinary team collaboration and psychosocial supports. |
14-15marks Excellent outline of early stage and end stage renal disease including symptoms, symptom management, treatments, multidisciplinary team collaboration and psychosocial supports. Indicates comprehensive insight & research into the topic |
11-13 marks Very good outline of early stage and end stage renal disease including symptoms, symptom management, treatments, multidisciplinary team collaboration and psychosocial supports. Indicates strong insight and research into the topic |
8-10 marks Good outline of early stage and end stage renal disease including symptoms, symptom management, treatments, multidisciplinary team collaboration and psychosocial supports. Indicates satisfactory insight into the topic, further research required |
7.5 marks Basic outline of early stage and end stage renal disease including symptoms, symptom management, treatments, multidisciplinary team collaboration and psychosocial supports. Indicates beginner insight into the topic and limited research skills and depth of discussion |
0-7 marks Little or no outline of early stage and end stage renal disease including symptoms, symptom management, treatments, multidisciplinary team collaboration and psychosocial supports. Demonstrates lack of understanding of the topic with limited to no demonstration of research skills |
/15 |
Criteria 3 BODY Uses the video analysis of “Betty’s story” and further research to compare and contrast the differences in the person-centred care management of renal disease in both early stages and end stage. |
9-10 marks Excellent comparison of the differences in the person-centred care management of renal disease in both early stages and end stage. |
7-8 marks Very good comparison of the differences in the person centred care management of renal disease in both early stages and end stage. |
6 marks Good comparison of the differences in the person centred care management of renal disease in both early stages and end stage. |
5 marks Basic comparison of the differences in the person centred care management of renal disease in both early stages and end stage. and differences and depth of |
0-4 marks Little or no comparison of the differences in the person centred care management of renal disease in both early stages and end stage. Demonstrates lack of understanding of the topic |
/10 |
Criteria 4 CONCLUSION Provides a coherent summary of the report that demonstrates student understanding of the differences in care between early stage and end stage renal disease. |
5 marks Excellent conclusion that demonstrates students understanding of the differences in care between early stage and end stage renal disease. |
4 marks Very good conclusion that demonstrates students understanding of the differences in care between early stage and end stage renal disease |
3 marks Good conclusion that demonstrates adequate student understanding of the differences in care between early stage and end stage renal disease |
2.5 marks Basic conclusion that demonstrates basic student understanding of the differences in care between early stage and end stage renal disease |
0-2 marks Conclusion fails to demonstrate student understanding of the differences in care between early stage and end stage renal disease |
/5 |
Criteria 5 ACADEMIC STANDARD Paper is written according to academic standards |
5 marks Excellent written paper of required length and format with minimal |
4 marks Very good written paper of required length and format with minimal syntax, spelling |
3 marks Good written paper of required length and format with some syntax, spelling |
2.5 marks Paper is basic, but improvement is needed to meet the required academic |
0-2 marks Paper is not written to the required academic standards. Length and formatting needs |
NSG3101 ASSESSMENT 4 – VIDEO ANALYSIS & CASE STUDY REPORT MARKING GUIDE
OFFICIAL Holmesglen: SQ BNurs 11-May-2022 \ad.holmesglen.edu.auholmesglenStaff-FDIRsquirk2DesktopNSG 3101Ass 4 Case study report Rubric.docx
(referencing, syntax, grammar, spelling, formatting, and length) and cites 10+ reputable, current references using APA 7th style. |
syntax, spelling and/or grammar issues. Paper cites 10+ reputable, current references using APA 7th. |
and/or grammar issues. Paper cites 10+ reputable, current references using APA 7th |
and/or grammar issues, but these do not distract from the quality of the work. Paper cites 10+ mostly reputable and current references using APA 7th |
standards. Paper is not of the required length or is not formatted correctly and referencing could improve. Syntax, grammar and/or spelling often |
work. Referencing is inadequate or not according to APA 7th. Mistakes in syntax, grammar and/or spelling consistently distract from the quality of the work. |
/5 |
TOTAL MARK | High Distinction >35 | Distinction >30 | Credit >25 | Pass >20 | Fail <20 | /40 |