School of Education
EDUC5005 EDUC5012 MTPS500 Theories of Development and Learning | Assessment 2 / Case Study |Total marks: 50

HD Exemplary (40-50)	D Excellent (35-39)	CR Proficient (30-34)	P Sound (25-29)	F Unresolved (0-24)
Criterion 1 24 marks Theoretical Perspectives – Identify and discuss relevant educational theory and concepts	Clear, accurate and comprehensive explanations of the chosen situation, indicating in-depth, evidence-based knowledge of the principles and concepts of three different theoretical perspectives.	Clear and accurate explanations of the chosen situation, indicating in-depth, evidence-based knowledge of the principles and concepts of three different theoretical perspectives.	Clear, explanations of the chosen situation, indicating reasonable, evidence-based knowledge of the principles and concepts of three different theoretical perspectives.	Accurate explanations of the chosen situation, indicating knowledge of the principles and concepts of three different theoretical perspectives	Limited or inaccurate knowledge presented of the principles and concepts of three different theoretical perspectives
Criterion 2 21 marks Evidence-Based Interventions based on each chosen perspective to maximise learning and participation of all students	Innovative, valid research based strategies / interventions are proposed based on each chosen perspective to maximise learning and participation of all students. Submission demonstrates high level of understanding of the materials in set text and additional relevant sources.	Valid research based strategies/ interventions are proposed based on each chosen perspective to maximise learning and participation of all students. Submission demonstrates a reasonable level of understanding of the materials in set text and additional relevant sources.	Reasonable research based strategies/ interventions are proposed based on each chosen perspective to maximise learning and participation of all students. Some understanding of the materials in set text and additional relevant sources is evident.	Clear descriptions of evidence-based interventions based on each chosen perspective Only minimal understanding of the content of set text and additional sources is evident.	Lack of appropriate evidence or connection to each identified theory. Limited or inaccurate descriptions of interventions or these are inappropriate.
Criterion 3 5 marks Transcriptional elements of writing	Essentially free from spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors. Fluent sentence and paragraph construction.5 marks	Generally free from spelling, grammar, and punctuation,errors. Sentences and paragraphs are well-formed.4 marks	Occasional minor spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors. Sentences and paragraphs are generally coherent.3 marks	Frequent minor spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors. Some awkward construction of sentences and paragraphs.2.5 marks	Frequent and seriousspelling, grammar, and punctuation errors. Awkward or poor sentence and paragraph construction. 0-2 marks
Career No marks Achievement in relation to career goals	This assessment indicates an exemplary understanding of teaching a culturally diverse group of children with different skills, abilities and backgrounds. You should consider including it in your DPP as evidence of achievement against APST 1.3, 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6.	This assessment indicates an excellent understanding of teaching a culturally diverse group of children with different skills, abilities and backgrounds. You should consider including it in your DPP as evidence of achievement against APST 1.3, 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6.	This assessment indicates a proficient understanding of teaching a culturally diverse group of children with different skills, abilities and backgrounds. You should consider including it in your DPP as evidence of achievement against APST 1.3, 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6.	This assessment indicates a sound understanding of teaching a culturally diverse group of children with different skills, abilities and backgrounds. You should consider including it in your DPP as evidence of achievement against APST 1.3, 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6.	This assessment unfortunately does not indicate an understanding of teaching a culturally diverse group of children with different skills, abilities and backgrounds.
Integrity Acting honestly, ethically and fairly is taken very seriously in the University and relates to the way you work with others and share information, conduct relevant research, incorporate evidence, acknowledge the ideas and work of others (which includes using APA7 referencing conventions correctly), and present your work. Breaches are reported and can lead to penalties. Refer to Curtin’s Academic Integrity webpage, which provides comprehensive information and guidance. https://students.curtin.edu.au/essentials /rights/academic-integrity/	As best ascertained, you are undertaking your studies ethically; exploring relevant research and situating your own ideas within the academic discourse; and using APA7 conventions consistently and precisely to reflect this.	As best ascertained, you are undertaking your studies ethically, including ensuring that the ideas of others gained from your reading and research are acknowledged by correctly using APA7 paraphrasing, quoting and referencing conventions.	As best ascertained, you are undertaking your studies ethically, including ensuring that the ideas of others gained from your reading and research are acknowledged by correctly using APA7 paraphrasing, quoting and referencing conventions.	As best ascertained, you are undertaking your studies ethically, including applying APA7 paraphrasing, quoting and referencing conventions to acknowledge ideas of others gained from your reading and research; however, some minor errors indicate you need to be more vigilant about doing this accurately and consistently.	Purposely left blank.

Created on:day/month/year