‘Professional Identity and Development Plan

21/10/2018 3012EHR_3188
https://bblearn.griffith.edu.au/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_22333_1&course_id=_69778_1 1/4
Assessment 2: Part A ‘Professional Identity and Development Plan’
Worth 25%
Levels of Achievement
Criteria Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Ability to reÓect on and
analyse current
professional identity,
using knowledge, skills
and attributes that
employers are seeking
(Where am I currently?)
85 to 100 %
Demonstrated
clear, focused and
highly insightful
reÓection and
analysis of current
situation
75 to 84.5 %
Demonstrated
very good
reÓection and
analysis of
current situation.
65 to 74.5 %
Demonstrated
good level of
ability to reÓect
and analyse
current situation.
49 to 64.5 %
Adequate
attempts have
been made to
reÓect and
analyse current
situation.
0 to 48.5 %
Very little or no
demonstrated
reÓection and
analysis of current
situation.
Demonstrates
knowledge of future
study and professional
development options to
assist with forward
planning (Where do I
want to be?)
85 to 100 %
Demonstrated
clear, focused and
highly insightful
level of forward
thinking and
planning.
75 to 84.5 %
Demonstrated
very good level of
forward thinking
and planning.
65 to 74.5 %
Demonstrated
good level of
forward thinking
and planning.
49 to 64.5 %
Adequate
attempts have
been made in
regards to
forward thinking
and planning.
0 to 48.5 %
Very little or no ability
in regards to forward
thinking or planning.
Name
Description
Rubric Detail
Weight
20.00%
Weight
20.00%

21/10/2018 3012EHR_3188
https://bblearn.griffith.edu.au/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_22333_1&course_id=_69778_1 2/4
Levels of Achievement
Criteria Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Ability to reÓect on and
align personal
attributes, beliefs and
values to a chosen
profession (Why do I
want to be there?)
85 to 100 %
Demonstrated a
clear and highly
insightful reÓection
and critical
evaluation of their
professional
identity with
e×ective links
made to beliefs,
values and/or
personal
attributes.
75 to 84.5 %
Demonstrated
very good level of
reÓection and
critical evaluation
of their
professional
identity with
e×ective links
made to beliefs,
values and/or
personal
attributes.
65 to 74.5 %
Demonstrated a
good level of
reÓection and
critical
evaluation of
their
professional
identity with
some links made
to beliefs, values
and/or personal
attributes.
49 to 64.5 %
Demonstrated an
adequate
reÓection and
critical evaluation
of their
professional
identity with few
links made to
beliefs, values
and/or personal
attributes
0 to 48.5 %
Very little or no ability
to reÓect upon and
critically evaluate
professional identity.
Links made to beliefs,
values and/or
personal attributes
are absent or require
greater focus.
Demonstrates ability to
research, identify and
develop speciÒc action
plans and strategies to
achieve desired career
outcomes (How will I get
there?)
85 to 100 %
Demonstrates
extensive research
and identiÒcation
of highly relevant
action plans and
future strategies
for achieving
desired career
outcomes.
75 to 84.5 %
Demonstrates
comprehensive
research and
identiÒcation of
relevant action
plans and future
strategies for
achieving desired
career outcomes.
65 to 74.5 %
Demonstrates a
good level of
research and
identiÒcation of
suitable action
plans and future
strategies for
achieving desired
career outcomes.
49 to 64.5 %
Demonstrates an
adequate level of
research to
provide a range
of somewhat
relevant action
plans and future
strategies for
achieving desired
career outcomes.
0 to 48.5 %
Demonstrates limited
research and very
little or no evidence
of speciÒc action
plans and strategies
for achieving desired
career outcomes.
Weight
20.00%
Weight
20.00%

21/10/2018 3012EHR_3188
https://bblearn.griffith.edu.au/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_22333_1&course_id=_69778_1 3/4
Levels of Achievement
Criteria Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Referencing
85 to 100 %
Utilises highly
relevant
referenced
sources. It is very
clear how each
piece of literature
validates the
claims and
objectives being
made.
75 to 84.5 %
Utilises relevant
referenced
sources. It is clear
how each piece of
literature
validates the
claims and
objectives being
made.
65 to 74.5 %
Utilises some
good referenced
sources. It is
clear how each
piece of
literature
validates the
claims and
objectives being
made.
49 to 64.5 %
Utilises some
good referenced
sources. It is
somewhat clear
how each piece
of literature
validates the
claims and
objectives
0 to 48.5 %
Does not utilise at
least four referenced
sources or referenced
sources are not
correctly
used/applied. It is not
clear how each piece
of literature validates
the claims and
objectives being
made.
Presentation/Formatting 85 to 100 %
Exceptional quality
of writing (i.e.,
spelling, grammar,
readability, clarity
of ideas). Wellexecuted
presentation,
consistent
formatting, free of
technical errors.
75 to 84.5 %
Very good quality
of writing (i.e.,
spelling,
grammar,
readability, clarity
of ideas). Some
minor
presentation and
technical errors.
65 to 74.5 %
Good quality of
writing (i.e.,
spelling,
grammar,
readability,
clarity of ideas).
Various
presentation,
technical and
grammatical
errors.
49 to 64.5 %
Adequate quality
of writing.
Improvement is
needed in
regards to the
general
formatting,
presentation and
readability of the
report.
0 to 48.5 %
Low quality of writing.
Improvement is
needed to regards to
the presentation,
formatting, spelling,
grammar, clarity and
readability.
Weight
6.00%
Weight
14.00%
View Associated Items
Print Close Window
21/10/2018 3012EHR_3188
https://bblearn.griffith.edu.au/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_22333_1&course_id=_69778_1 4/4