MKT101A Assessment 2 Brief 20191111 Page 5 of 8
Marking Rubrics – Assessment 3: Marketing Report
Assessment Attributes |
Fail (Unacceptable) (0-49) |
Pass (Functional) (50-64) |
Credit (Proficient) (65-74) |
Distinction (Advanced) (75-84) |
High Distinction (Exceptional) (85-100) |
Background Provided background information of the chosen business and product/service aligned with marketing concept. 5% |
Did not provide enough information of the chosen business and the market it operates in. Inadequate information. Lack of identification of specific product/service |
Limited attempt to explain the chosen business and the market it operates in. Basic background information provided. Limited attempt to explain the product/service |
Good attempt to explain the chosen business and the market it operates in using relevant and up-to date information from a limited number of reliable sources. Product/service sufficiently explained with relevant and appropriate information. |
Very good explanation of the chosen business and the market it operates in. Business’s background is well synthesised and evidence of research provided from a variety of reliable sources to establish the marketing context. Very good explanation of the product/service. |
Excellent explanation of the chosen business and the market it operates in. Business’s background is well synthesised and evidence of research provided from a variety of reliable sources to establish the marketing context. Excellent explanation of the product/service. |
Situation Analysis Key macro and micro environmental factors that are impacting on the industry and company of your choice. 10% |
Limited recognition and analysis of macro and micro factors. Mostly theory with no practical relevance. |
Identification of few macro and micro factors with some key information provided for each. |
Identification of relevant key macro and micro factors. Good analysis of environmental factors |
Very strong identification of key macro and micro factors. Very strong analysis of external factors. |
Sophisticated identification and analysis of key macro and micro factors. |
SWOT Analysis Identification of internal and external factors impacting the marketing of a business 10% |
SWOT analysis did not contain key relevant internal and external factors. Did not meet the brief requirements |
SWOT analysis included some key relevant internal and external factors. Internal and external factors are limited to support marketing decisions. Met the minimum briefs |
SWOT analysis included key relevant internal and external factors, however some elements require some level of improvement. A good identification of internal and external factors that are relevant to |
SWOT analysis included key relevant internal and external factors. A very good identification of internal and external factors that are relevant to support marketing decisions. |
SWOT analysis included a wide variety of relevant internal and external factors. An excellent identification of internal and external factors that are relevant to support marketing decisions. |
MKT101A Assessment 2 Brief 20191111 Page 5 of 8
support marketing decisions. |
|||||
Segmentation, Target Market & Positioning |
Segmentation variables are unclear and demographic, geographic, |
Some segmentation variables identified. Demographic, |
An adequate number of segmentation variables identified. Good |
Very good selection of demographic, geographic, |
Excellent selection of demographic, geographic, psychographic and |
Identified consumer buyer characteristics utilising demographics, geographic, psychographics and behavioural variables. |
psychographic and behavioural characteristics not identified Target market has not been identified |
geographic, psychographic and behavioural segmentation variables included with some adjustments required. Target market profile has been identified for the business but is weak and lacks depth |
selection of demographic, geographic, psychographic and behavioural variables. An acceptable target market profile identified for the business. |
psychographic and behavioural variables. Relevant and reliable sources used to support the identification of segment(s). Very good target market profileidentified for the business. |
behavioural variables. Relevant and reliable sources used to support the identification of segment(s). Excellent target market profile identified for the business. |
Identification of a positioning statement. 15% |
Positioning statement not clearly identified. |
Positioning statement included some relevant values and benefits. |
Good positioning statement including relevant values and |
Very good positioning statement including relevant values and |
Excellent positioning statement including relevant values and |
benefits. | benefits. | benefits. | |||
Marketing Mix Identified marketing mix variables including |
Product strategies applied/suggested with adjustments required. |
Product strategies applied/suggested with adjustments required. |
Good application of product strategies. |
Very good application of product strategies. |
Excellent application of product strategies. |
MKT101A Assessment 2 Brief 20191111 Page 6 of 8
relevant product, price, place, promotion, people process and physical evidence |
|||||
strategies. 40% |
Pricing strategies applied/suggested with adjustments required. |
Pricing strategies applied/suggested with adjustments required. |
Good application of pricing strategies. |
Very good application of pricing strategies. |
Excellent application of pricing strategies. |
Marketing/distribution channel strategy not correctly identified. |
Marketing/distribution channel strategy correctly identified. |
Marketing/distribution channel strategy correctly identified. |
Very good application of place / distribution strategies. |
Excellent application of place /distribution strategies. |
|
Promotional strategies were not identified and/or did not provide relevant information and linkage with the target market. |
Promotional strategies basically identified/ suggested. Some relevant information and linkage with the target market provided. |
Good promotional strategies identified/ suggested. Good level of details provided through research and clear linkage with the target market showed. |
Promotional strategies identified with a very good level of detail provided through good level of research and clear linkage with the target market showed. |
Promotional strategies identified with excellent detail provided through robust research and referencing and clear linkage with the target market showed. |
|
No or very weak | Lack of referenced | ||||
referenced marketing concepts and terminologies used to support the discussion. |
marketing concepts and terminologies used to support the discussion. |
Good referencing of marketing concepts and terminologies used to support the discussion. |
Very good referencing of marketing concepts and terminologies used to support the discussion. |
Excellent referencing and engagement of marketing concepts and terminologies used to support the discussion. |
|
Recommendations 10% |
Recommendations not included and/or information is not relevant to client and/or target audience. |
Acceptable level of recommendations identified and included some level of information |
Good level of information provided to explain the recommendations |
Very good level of information provided to explain the recommendations. |
Sophisticated level of information provided to explain the |
MKT101A Assessment 2 Brief 20191111 Page 7 of 8
Some examples provided. |
recommendations supported by excellent examples. |
||||
Some relevance to client and/or target audience presented. |
Clear and relevant information provided showing linkage with the client and/or target audience. |
Very good information and research provided showing linkage with the client and/or target audience. |
Excellent information and high level of research provided showing linkage with the client and/or target audience. |
||
Good support with application of marketing principles |
Very good support of recommendations using application of marketing principles and references. |
Excellent support of recommendations using sophisticated application of marketing principles and references. |
|||
Quality and accuracy of referencing and communication skills |
Few credible and research sources used. |
Limited quality and credible research sources used. |
Reasonable quality and credible research sources used. |
Very good quality and credible research sources used. |
Excellent engagement of quality and credible research sources. |
Some mistakes with in- | Some mistakes with in- | Limited mistakes with | Very few mistakes with | No mistakes with in-text | |
10% | text citations and the reference list. |
text citations and the reference list. |
in-text citations and the reference list. |
in-text citations and the reference list. |
citations and the reference list. |
Information is difficult to understand for the audience. No logical/clear structure and spelling |
Information is not always clear and logical to understand for the audience and lacks clear structure. |
Information is mostly clear and logical to understand for the audience. A clear structure and |
Information is clear and logical to understand for the audience and well supported by evidence. |
Information is logical and persuasive. Relevant concepts and theories applied. Very strongly supported by evidence. |
|
and grammatical errors throughout. |
Some spelling and grammatical errors |
few spelling and grammatical errors |
Very minor spelling and grammatical |
Free of spelling and |
MKT101A Assessment 2 Brief 20191111 Page 8 of 8
No headings, subheadings, and other submission guidelines not followed. |
throughout. Limited headings, subheadings, and/or some submission guidelines require adjustments. |
throughout. Headings and subheadings and other assessment requirements are consistent with submission guidelines. |
errors throughout. Headings, subheadings and other submission guidelines are consistent with submission guidelines. |
grammatical errors throughout. Headings, subheadings and other submission guidelines are consistent with submission guidelines. |