Marking guide with assessment criteria

Assessment Criteria

Marking guide with assessment criteria


HD 100-85% D 84-75% C 74-65% P 64-50% F 49-1% F 0%
Structure 1 (5%) Excellent presentation of assignment with the inclusion of all correct components. Double line spacing with 12-point Times New Roman font used. Consistently accurate with spelling, grammar, and paragraph structure. Well-presented assignment, with inclusion of required components. Double line spacing with 12-point Times New Roman font used. 1 or 2 errors in spelling, grammar, or paragraph structure. Organisation and structure of the assignment are appropriate, with the inclusion of most required components. Double line spacing with 12-point Times New Roman font used. 3 or 4 consistent errors with spelling, grammar, or paragraph structure. Adequate assignment presentation, however, organisation and structure allow misinterpretation of the meaning of the content. Double line spacing with 12-point Times New Roman font used. 5 to 6 consistent errors with spelling, grammar, or paragraph structure. Assignment presentation does not follow template. Critical components are missing. Organisation and structure detract from the meaning of the content. Double spacing not used. 12-point Times New Roman font not used. 8 to 15 inconsistent errors with spelling, grammar, or paragraph structure. Poorly presented assignment. Assessment template not used. More than 15 inaccuracies in spelling, grammar, or paragraph structure.
Structure 2 (5%) Content is clearly relevant to the topic. The approach comprehensively addresses the assignment task, and the argument proceeds logically. Supporting literature is clearly integrated throughout the assignment. Adheres to word count. Content is relevant to the topic. The approach clearly addresses the assignment task, and the argument proceeds logically. Supporting literature is used appropriately throughout. Adheres to word count. Content is appropriate and addresses the assignment task and the argument, for the most part, proceeds logically. Minimal omissions in integration to supporting literature throughout assignment. Adheres to word count. Content addresses the assignment task although the argument is at times repetitive or lacks cohesion. Frequent omissions in the integration of supporting literature throughout the assignment. Adheres to word count. Inadequate description of required content. Assignment task not addressed. Little discernible critical thought. Little integration of supporting literature in the assignment. Does not adhere to word count. Content does not address the assignment task. No discernible critical thought. No integration of supporting literature in the assignment. Does not adhere to word count.
Task 1  (35%) 1.1 Skillful summary of three themes within the evidence related to the clinical problem (post-operative shivering caused by perioperative hypothermia). Findings are related to the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards. 1.2 Four completed appraisal tools included in the appendix. 1.1 Detailed summary of three themes within the evidence related to the clinical problem (post-operative shivering caused by perioperative hypothermia). Findings are related to the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards. 1.2 Three completed appraisal tools included in the appendix. 1.1 Logical summary of three themes within the evidence related to the clinical problem (post-operative shivering caused by perioperative hypothermia). Findings are related to the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards. 1.2 Three completed appraisal tools included in the the appendix. 1.1 Appropriate summary of three themes within the evidence related to the clinical problem (post-operative shivering caused by perioperative hypothermia). Findings are related to the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards. 1.2 Two completed appraisal tools included in the appendix. 1.1 Limited summary of two or less themes within the evidence related to the clinical problem (post-operative shivering caused by perioperative hypothermia). Findings are not related to the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards. 1.2 One complete appraisal tool included in the appendix. 1.1. No themes identified or themes not related to the clinical problem (post-operative shivering caused by perioperative hypothermia). Findings are not related to the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards. 1.2 No appraisal tools included in the appendix.
Task 2  (25%) 2.1 Clearly and accurately discusses four recommendations to incorporate evidence into policies and clinical nursing practice. 2.2 Four appropriate justifications that confirm nursing clinical decision making is based on the best available evidence. 2.1 Discusses four recommendations to incorporate evidence into policies and clinical nursing practice. 2.2 Four sufficient justifications that show nursing clinical decision making to be based on the best available evidence. 2.1 Describes four recommendations to incorporate evidence into policies and clinical nursing practice. 2.2 Four basic justifications that somewhat indicate nursing clinical decision making is based on the best available evidence. 2.1 Provides three basic recommendations to incorporate evidence into policies and clinical nursing practice. 2.2 Three basic justifications that show limited nursing clinical decision making based on the best available evidence. 2.1 Less than three recommendations provided to incorporate evidence into policies and clinical nursing practice. 2.2 Less than three justifications. Nursing clinical decision making is not based on the best available evidence. 2.1 No recommendations are provided to incorporate evidence into policies and clinical nursing practice. 2.2 No justifications are provided.
Task 3  (15%) Highly developed reflection and insight with regards to the purpose of evidence-based nursing practice and how this can assist in clinical nursing decision making. Well-developed reflection and insight with regards to the purpose of evidence-based nursing practice and how this can assist in clinical nursing decision making. Adequately developed reflection and some insight with regards to the purpose of evidence-based nursing practice and how this can assist in clinical nursing decision making. Somewhat developed reflection and insight with regards to the purpose of evidence-based nursing practice and how this can assist in clinical nursing decision making. Some points are descriptive rather than reflective. Little or limited reflection with regards to the purpose of evidence-based nursing practice and how this can assist in clinical nursing decision making. No reflection as to the purpose of evidence-based nursing practice and how this can assist in clinical nursing decision making.
Intext citations  (5%) Consistently accurate with intext citations in APA 7th style to support and reflect all ideas, information, and quotations. 1 or 2 consistent in-text citation errors in APA 7th style identified. Intext citations support and reflect all ideas, information, and quotations. 3 or 4 consistent in-text citations errors in APA 7th style identified. Intext citations support and reflect all ideas, information, and quotations. 5 to 6 consistent or inconsistent in-text citation errors in APA 7th style identified. Intext citations support and reflect all ideas, information, and quotations. In-text citations are not consistent with APA 7th style. 7 to 10 inaccuracies with intext citations. Limited intext citations used to support ideas, Information and quotations. APA 7th style not used. No references included. 11 or more inaccuracies with intext citations. No intext citations used to support ideas, information and quotations.
Referencing 

(5%)

A minimum of 8 current credible references used, including at least 4 journal articles, as well as 1 clinical practice guideline, 2 relevant websites, and the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards. A minimum of 7 current references used, including at least 3 journal articles, as well as 1 clinical practice guideline, 2 relevant websites, and the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards. A minimum of 6 current references used, including at least 3 journal articles, as well as 1 clinical practice guideline, 1 relevant website, and the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards. A minimum of 5 current references used, including at least 2 journal articles, as well as 1 clinical practice guideline, 1 relevant website, and the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards. 4 or less current references used, including journal articles and/or clinical practice guidelines. Relevant web sites not used. Clinical practice guidelines not used. The National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards not used. No references used
Reference List (5%) Reference list is in alphabetical order and fully adheres to reference list presentation guidelines APA 7th style. Reference list appears in alphabetical order and consistently adheres to reference list presentation Guidelines APA 7th style (1-2 different errors). Reference list appears in alphabetical order and frequently adheres to reference list presentation guidelines APA 7th style (3-4 different errors). Reference list appears in alphabetical order and occasionally adheres to reference list presentation guidelines APA 7th style (5-6 different errors). Reference list is not in alphabetical order and does not adhere to reference list presentation guidelines for APA 7th style (7 or more different errors). No reference list included in the assignment.