Marking Criteria

® please Decor MYOB Home A Aclol. di- TAX It’ Fi na nc Reviev file:///
&courseid=_42469_1
Marking Criteria:
Criteria , P C 0 HO Orientation, as shown by title, introduction, description or depiction of site or operation, extent of engagement. contact details, and general substance inventory. Orientation to operation/premises incomplete or very weak suggestive of substantial problems relating to Investigation or engagement, under- standing of factors of toxicological relevance, or ability to con• struct logical poisons inventory Orientation to operation/premises lacks clarity suggestive of problems relating to investigation or engagement. understanding of factors of toxicological relevance, or ability to construct logical poisons inventory Orientation to operation/premises is clearly shown suggesting acceptable investigation and engagement, good understanding of factors of toxicological relevance, and ability to construct logical poisons inventory Orientation to operation/premises is well shown suggesting good investigation and engagement, understanding of factors of toxicological relevance, and ability to construct logical poisons inventory Orientation to operationjpremises is very well shown suggesting excellent investigation and engagement, understanding of factors of toxicological relevance, and ability to construct logical poisons inventory Hazard identification. . shown by selection of main 4 based on. intrinsic toxicity (access to, and use of, measures) exposure potential (environmental and operational factors). The Audit does not presem adequate information on intrinsic toxicity, or exposure potential in terms of environmental and operational factors. and/or does not integrate this information in identifying relative hazards. The Audit does not beady identify information On both intrinsic toxicity, and exposure potential in terms of environmental and operational factors. and is unable to integrate this information well in identifying relative hazards. rhe Audit identifies information on boy intrinsic toxicity, and exposure potential in terms of qnvironmental and ,perational factors. and integrates tlth information well in identifying relative hazards. The Audit clearly identifies information on both intrinsic toxicity, and exposure potential in terrns of environmental and operational factors. and integrate: this information well in identifying relative hazards The Audit clearly identifies information on both intrinsic toxicity, and exposure potential in terms of environmental and operational factors, and integrates this information exceptionally well in identifying relative hazards Risk characterisation. as shown by chemical and pathophysidogical properties of main 4. exposure routes. disposition. health impacts, case records. etc. Main 4 are not characterised. or are inadequately characterised. in terms of chemical and pathophysidogical doperties. exposure routes. disposition, health impacts. etc. Main 4 are only partially characterised in terms of chemical and pathophysiological properties, exposure routes. disposition. health impacts. etc. Main 4 are characterised in terms of chemical and pathophysiological rxoperties. exposure routes. disposition, health impacts. etc. Main 4 are well characterised in terms of chemical and pathophysidogical properties, exposure routes, disposition, health impacts, etc. Main 4 are exceptionally well characterised in terms of chemical and pathophysiological properties, exposure routes. disposition, health impacts, etc. Risk management. as shown by. general measures local measures relating to specific substances, environment, and procedures. Risk management is not dealt with, or is very poorly dealt with, in terms of general and local measures Risk management could be better dealt with in terms of general and local measures Risk management Is satisfactory in terms of general and local rneasures Risk management is well done in terms of both general and local measures Risk management exceptionally well done in terms of both general and local fTleJ3Ufe, Report Professionalism. shown by the quality of presentation and referencing. Audit lacks quality or completeness In one or more of the areas of referencing. structure. and., writing quality. Audit lacks quality in terms of one or rnore of the areas of referencing. structure, and writing quality. I he audit is J satisfactory product in terms of referencing. structure and writing quality. All. is a product of good quality in terrns of referencing, structure and writing quality. Audit is J product of exceptional qualiry in terms of referencing, structure and writing qUality.