Marking Criteria

INT102 Assessment 1B Written Report Marking Criteria

REPORT
CRITERIA
Weight F
0 – 49%
P
50 – 59%
C
60 – 69%
D
70 – 79%
HD
80 >
Presentation 10 No coversheet.
Formatting guidelines not
followed.
Coversheet present with
missing details. Formatting
guidelines observed but not in
full.
Completed coversheet.
Most formatting guidelines
observed.
Correctly completed coversheet
including word count.
Formatting guidelines observed
with minor inconsistencies.
Correctly completed coversheet
with all required information
provided. Fully observes
formatting guidelines.
Academic
Writing
20 Poor word choice; Poor
syntax; Incorrect/poor use of
language.
Satisfactory attempt in
academic writing; Syntax and
structure evident but with
multiple errors.
Correct written expression;
Good syntax and structure of
assessment with some errors.
Clear, concise and correct
writing; Very good syntax and
structure of assessment with
few errors.
Sophisticated clarity,
conciseness, and correctness of
writing; Excellent written
expression.
Introduction 10 Introduction absent, poorly
written or not related to the
topic.
Mentions topic. Covers topic. Covers topic; Provides direction
for assessment.
Covers topic clearly; Provides
context & direction of
assessment.
Discussion 30 Little to no stated description
of barriers; Poor
understanding of
requirements for working
with chosen client group or
case study. Little to no
identification of resources
that assist communication.
Very little stated description of
barriers; Some understanding of
requirements for working with
chosen client group or case
study. Very little identification
of resources that assist with
communication.
Good and clearly stated
description of barriers; Good
understanding of requirements
for working with chosen client
group or case study. Good
identification of resources that
assist with communication.
Very good and clearly stated
description of barriers; clear
understanding of requirements
for working with chosen client
group and case study. Very
good Identification of resources
that assist with communication.
Excellent and clearly stated
description of barriers; in-depth
understanding of requirements
for working with chosen client
group and case study. Excellent
identification of resources that
assist with communication.
Conclusion 10 No summary or conclusion. Poor summary and conclusion Good summary and conclusion. Very good summary and
conclusion; attempt at
integration of personal learning.
Excellent summary and
conclusion; integration of
personal learning.
Research 10 No evidence of research. References scarcely used;
Weak, outdated or
inappropriate external sources
used.
References cited;
Attempt at using credible
academic sources.
References used well;
Current, peer reviewed
academic sources used
effectively.
References used effectively;
Credible, peer reviewed &
current academic sources used
effectively and extensively to
support discussion; use of text
book.
Referencing 10 No in-text referencing;
Reference List absent or
poorly presented; APA 7 not
used or poorly observed.
Attempt made at in-text
referencing; Reference List has
errors; APA 7 guidelines
observed but not in full.
In-text references cited;
Reference List has some errors;
APA 7 guidelines observed to
some extent.
In-text references cited with
few errors; Reference list
presented with few errors; APA
7 observed well.
In-text references correctly
cited; Reference list presented
with no errors; APA 7 guidelines
observed fully.
TOTAL /20%