(HPOs) are often described as those with better performance

Assessment Brief Module Code: PGBM02 Module Title: Managing and Leading People Canvas & JIRA Deadline Date: Tuesday 6th February 2018 at 16:00 Instructions on Assessment: ‘High-Performance Organisations†(HPOs) are often described as those with better performance than of its peer group over a long period of time and have attributes of; strong financial results, satisfied customers and employees, high levels of individual initiative, productivity and innovation, aligned performance measurement and reward systems, and strong leadership (Waal & Heijtel, 2017; Epstein 2004). The role of Line Managers and Leaders in such organisations is crucial to their success. Produce a 3,000-word report in which you address the two components: Part A: Critically analyse the Leadership characteristics necessary to create a ‘HighPerformance Organisation†(HPO). (In your analysis you should outline what you consider are the major characteristics, justify why you believe they are important and align these to appropriate leadership styles). Part B: Critically analyse how a Manager can enhance organisational performance in one of the following areas: • People Resourcing • Learning and Development • Motivation and Engagement • Performance Appraisal/ Measurement • Culture (In your analysis you must define the key practice you have chosen, identify and critically discuss an appropriate model relating to the practice and analyse the role of a manager in enhancing this for a HPO). The report is worth 100% of the module mark. Word Limits for the assignment:3,000 words (+-10%). The word count is to be declared on the front page of your assignment. Summarising and compressing the information in your assignment into the word limit is one of the skills that students are expected to acquire, and demonstrate as part of the assignment process. The word count does not include: Title and Contents page, Executive Summary, Figures and Tables, Reference and Bibliography and appendices Exams and Assessments/PGBM02/2017 Page 1 of 4 Submission of Assessment: All assignments must be submitted on Canvas first. A Turnitin Report will be generated, which then needs to be submitted on JIRA along with the original file. Therefore there will be 2 attachments on JIRA. Your mark and feedback will be made available to you electronically on JIRA once the internal moderation process has taken place, you should note that at this stage marks are still subject to external examiner and academic board approval. Referencing your work In this institution the Harvard method of referencing is used. The Harvard method of referring to publications and of arranging references uses the author’s name and the date of the publication. References are listed at the end of the text in alphabetical order by author’s name. The general format of a journal reference is shown below: Smith, J. (1999) How to succeed! Journal of Entrepreneurs , 1(2), p. 34-56 Authorâ€s name and initials are listed first, followed by year of publication in brackets. Then there is the title of article and the journal where article appears, which is underlined or in italics. Finally, state the volume and issue Number (in brackets) along with the pages where article can be located. Academic Integrity and Misconduct: Your attention is drawn to the Universityâ€s stated position on plagiarism. THE WORK OF OTHERS, WHICH IS INCLUDED IN THE ASSIGNMENT MUST BE ATTRIBUTED TO ITS SOURCE (a full bibliography and/or a list of references must be submitted as prescribed in the assessment brief). Please note that this is intended to be an individual piece of work. Action will be taken where a student is suspected of having cheated or engaged in any dishonest practice.Students are referred to the University regulations on plagiarism and other forms of academic irregularity. Students must not copy or collude with one another or present any information that they themselves have not generated. For further information on academic integrity and misconduct see http://ift.tt/2nVKXt6 Exams and Assessments/PGBM02/2017 Page 2 of 4Generic Assessment Criteria – Postgraduate These should be interpreted according to the level at which you are working Categories Grade Relevance Knowledge Analysis Argument and Structure Critical Evaluation Presentation Reference to Literature 86 – 100% The work examined is exemplary and provides clear evidence of a complete grasp of the knowledge, understanding and skills app ropriate to the Level of the qualification. There is also unequivocal evidence showing that all the learning outcomes and responsibilities appropriate to that Level are fully satisfied. At this level it is expected that the work will be exemplary in all the categories cited above. It will demonstrate a particularly compelling evaluation, originality, and elegance of argument, interpretation or discourse. 76-85% The work examine…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *