Grading criteria

6/9/22, 4:48 PM HLTH 1052 (2378): Portfolio Task 4: Vulnerable groups & Self-Harm (15%; Week 10)
https://uo.unisa.edu.au/mod/assign/view.php?id=398403 1/2
remaining 2 days 23 hours
Grading criteria

No
submission or
no
understanding
of needs
Little
understanding
of the mental
health needs
of the
vulnerable
group
Mostly
accurate
understan
of the men
health nee
of the
vulnerable
group
Vulnerable
groups
Understanding
of the mental
health needs
of the
vulnerable
group 10%
No
submission or
no
considerations
discussed
Inadequate
discussion of
considerations
when
providing
mental health
care to the
identified
vulnerable
group
Mostly clea
discussion
considerati
when
providing
mental hea
care to the
identified
vulnerable
group
Vulnerable
groups
Considerations
when
providing
mental health
care to the
identified
vulnerable
group 20%
No
submission
or no
guideline
integration
Inadequately
integration of
Mental Health
Guidelines
into the
considerations
Mostly
appropriate
Mental Health
Guidelines
were
integrated
into the
considerations
Vulnerable
groups
Integration of
Mental Health
Guidelines into
the
considerations
(10)
No
submission or
no
considerations
discussed
Considerations
when working
with a person
at risk of self
harm not
clearly
discussed
Mostly cle
discussion
considerat
when wor
with a per
at risk of s
harm
Self-harm –
considerations
when working
with a person
at risk of self
harm (15)
No
submission
or no
rationale
Unclear
description of
rationale for
considerations
for when
working with
a person at
risk of self
harm
Mostly
accurate
description of
rationales for
considerations
when working
with a person
at risk of self
harm
Self-harm –
description of
rationale for
considerations
when working
with a person
at risk of self
harm (15)
No
submission
or no
guideline
integration
Inadequately
integration of
Mental Health
Guidelines
into the
considerations
Most of the
appropriate
Mental Health
Guidelines
were
integrated
into the
considerations
Self-harm –
Integration of
Mental Health
Guidelines into
the
considerations
(10)
No
submission
Little
structure
in
arguments
with
unclear
writing
Mostly
structured
arguments
using
mostly
clear and
concise
formal
academic
writing
Well
using
clear
conci
writin
Presentation –
Structure and
writing 10%

struct
argum
forma
acade

6/9/22, 4:48 PM HLTH 1052 (2378): Portfolio Task 4: Vulnerable groups & Self-Harm (15%; Week 10)
https://uo.unisa.edu.au/mod/assign/view.php?id=398403 2/2

No
submission
or no
referencing
Harvard
UniSA
referencing
format for
in-text
citations
and
reference
list not
used
correctly
Mostly
appropriate
use of
Harvard
UniSA
referencing
format for
in text
citations
and
reference
list
Ex
use
refe
and
refe
list
Presentation –
Referencing
10%

ce
Harv
UniS
form
in te
citat