Fails to provide a satisfactory critique of a global issue where shared responsibility

UNCC300 Assessment Task 3 – Essay HD 85-100 Di 75-84 Cr 65-74 Pa 50-64 NN 0-49 Part 1 (10 marks) Provides a highly distinctive critique of a global issue where shared responsibility for the common good is not being realized. Provides a distinctive critique of a global issue where shared responsibility for the common good is not being realized. Provides a creditable critique of a global issue where shared responsibility for the common good is not being realized. Provides a satisfactory critique of a global issue where shared responsibility for the common good is not being realized. Fails to provide a satisfactory critique of a global issue where shared responsibility for the common good is not being realized Part 2 (30 marks) Provides a highly distinctive understanding of advocacy and its relationship to community engagement, in the context of principles of CST, in order to realize shared responsibility for the common good. Provides a distinctive understanding of advocacy and its relationship to community engagement, in the context of principles of CST, in order to realize shared responsibility for the common good Provides a creditable understanding of advocacy and its relationship to community engagement, in the context of principles of CST, in order to realize shared responsibility for the common good. Provides a satisfactory understanding of advocacy and its relationship to community engagement, in the context of principles of CST, in order to realize shared responsibility for the common good Fails to provide a satisfactory understanding of advocacy and its relationship to community engagement, in the context of principles of CST, in order to realize shared responsibility for the common good.HD DI CR PA NN Style and Writing Mechanics (5 marks) 2.0= F 2.5= P 3.25= C 3.75=D 4.0-5.0= HD Presents information in a very clear, coherent and highly engaging style. No errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. Presents information in a very clear, coherent engaging style. Few or no errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. Presents information in a clear, coherent engaging style. Few errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. Presents information in a satisfactory style. Some errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. Presents information in an unsatisfactory style. Many errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. Referencing (5 marks) 2.0= F 2.5= P 3.25= C 3.75=D 4.0-5.0= HD Exemplary citation of all sources of information to support the credibility and authority of the information presented. Very good referencing throughout; sources cited accurately and correctly. Provides fully accurate information about sources used. Good referencing throughout; sources cited accurately throughout. Provides accurate and sufficient information about sources used. Satisfactory referencing, in general; sources cited accurately, in general. Provides sufficient information about sources used. No referencing or numerous sources not cited accurately. Does not provide sufficient information about sources used.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *