Evidence Based Case Study

11/11/2022, 23:23 Preview Rubric: Assessment 2: Evidence Based Case Study Rubric – (HNB2008) Contemporary Nursing C – S – Victoria Uni…
https://vucollaborate.vu.edu.au/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=1711006&rubricId=525400&originTool=quicklinks 1/5
Assessment 2: Evidence Based Case Study Rubric
Course: (HNB2008) Contemporary Nursing C – S

Criteria Full Marks High
Distinction
(80-100%)
Distinction
(70-79%)
Credit (60-
60%)
Pass (50-
59%)
Needs
Improveme
nt (0-49%)
Criterion
Score
Critical
analysis
and
critical
thought
(LOs 1, 2,
4)
30 points
Full Marks
(30 Points)
/ 30 27 points
Exceptiona
l d
emonstra
tion of
clinical
reasoning,
focused
concepts
very well
supported,
justified
and
logical.
(24.0 –
29.7
Points)
22.5
points
Strong
demonstra
tion of
clinical
reasoning,
focused
concepts
are well
supported,
justified
and
logical.
(21.0 –
23.7
Points)
19.5
points
Good
demonstra
tion of
some
application
of clinical
reasoning,
focused
concepts
are mostly
supported
and
justified.
(18.0 –
20.7
Points)
16.5
points
Satisfactor
y d
emonstra
tion and
some
limitation
of clinical
reasoning
application
, concepts
unclear or
not well
justified.
(15.0 –
17.7
Points)
7.5 points
Poor or no
demonstra
tion of
clinical
reasoning.
Either no
concepts
applied, or
concepts
are unclear
and not
justified.
(0.0 – 14.7
Points)

11/11/2022, 23:23 Preview Rubric: Assessment 2: Evidence Based Case Study Rubric – (HNB2008) Contemporary Nursing C – S – Victoria Uni…
https://vucollaborate.vu.edu.au/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=1711006&rubricId=525400&originTool=quicklinks 2/5

Criteria Full Marks High
Distinction
(80-100%)
Distinction
(70-79%)
Credit (60-
60%)
Pass (50-
59%)
Needs
Improveme
nt (0-49%)
Criterion
Score
Identifica
tion of
theoretic
al and
practical
concepts
with
establish
ment of
relations
hips.
(LOs 1, 2,
4)
35 points 31.5
points
Succinct
articulatio
n of all
relevant
theoretical
and
practical
case study
concepts
with
clearly
establishe
d re
lationshi
ps
between
the
concepts
and the
case study
patient.
(28.0 –
34.7
Points)
/ 35 26.3
points
Clear
descriptio
n of all key
theoretical
and
practical
case study
concepts,
generally
establishin
g links
between
concepts
and the
case study
patient.
(24.5 –
27.7
Points)
22.8
points
Identificati
on and
descriptio
n of some
key
theoretical
and
practical
case study
concepts,
illustrating
the
relationshi
ps
between
these
concepts
and the
case study
patient.
(21.0 –
24.2
Points)
19.3
points
Identificati
on and
descriptio
n of
minimal
key
theoretical
or
practical
case study
concepts
with some
links
illustrating
relationshi
ps
between
these
concepts
and the
case study
patient.
(17.5 –
20.7
Points)
8.8 points
Identificati
on of no
relevant
key
theoretical
or
practical
case study
concepts
with no
clear links
establishe
d. Unclear
logical
sequence
with
insufficien
t detail
patient.
(0.0 – 17.2
Points)

11/11/2022, 23:23 Preview Rubric: Assessment 2: Evidence Based Case Study Rubric – (HNB2008) Contemporary Nursing C – S – Victoria Uni…
https://vucollaborate.vu.edu.au/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=1711006&rubricId=525400&originTool=quicklinks 3/5

Criteria Full Marks High
Distinction
(80-100%)
Distinction
(70-79%)
Credit (60-
60%)
Pass (50-
59%)
Needs
Improveme
nt (0-49%)
Criterion
Score
Languag
e,
expressio
n &
writing
style (LO
4)
15 points 13.5
points
Grammar
consistent
with
intended
meaning
and
spelling
accurate.
Essay
reads
without
interruptio
n. The
language
used is
articulate
and
eloquent.
(12.0 –
14.9
Points)
/ 15 11.3
points
Grammar
consistent
with
intended
meaning
and
spelling
minimal
inaccuraci
es.
The
language
used is
appropriat
e and
clear.
(10.5 –
11.9
Points)
9.8 points
Grammar
mostly
consistent
with
intended
meaning
and
occasional
spelling
errors.
The
language
used is
appropriat
e.
(9.0 – 10.4
Points)
8.3 points
Grammar
and
spelling
occasionall
y c
ompromis
es the
intended
meaning.
The
language
used is
mostly
appropriat
e, with
some
inaccuraci
es.
(7.5 – 8.9
Points)
3.8 points
Grammar
and
spelling
compromis
e the
intended
meaning.
Language
used is not
appropriat
e or has
many
inaccuraci
es.
(0.0 – 7.4
Points)

11/11/2022, 23:23 Preview Rubric: Assessment 2: Evidence Based Case Study Rubric – (HNB2008) Contemporary Nursing C – S – Victoria Uni…
https://vucollaborate.vu.edu.au/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=1711006&rubricId=525400&originTool=quicklinks 4/5

Criteria Full Marks High
Distinction
(80-100%)
Distinction
(70-79%)
Credit (60-
60%)
Pass (50-
59%)
Needs
Improveme
nt (0-49%)
Criterion
Score
Use of
literature
(LOs 1, 2,
4)
10 points 9 points
Integrates
and
synthesize
s relevant
and
credible
literature
from a
variety of
academic
and
current
sources to
support
arguments.
(8.0 – 9.9
Points)
/ 10 7.5 points
Clearly
links
synthesize
d literature
from a
variety of
academic
and
current
sources to
support
arguments.
(7.0 – 7.9
Points)
6.5 points
Links
literature
from a
variety of
academic
and
current
sources to
support
arguments.
(6.0 – 6.9
Points)
5.5 points
Links
literature
from
academic /
current
sources.
(5.0 – 5.9
Points)
2.5 points
Limited
reference
to
literature
from
academic /
current
sources or
literature
cited
inappropri
ate to the
case study.
(0.0 – 4.9
Points)

11/11/2022, 23:23 Preview Rubric: Assessment 2: Evidence Based Case Study Rubric – (HNB2008) Contemporary Nursing C – S – Victoria Uni…
https://vucollaborate.vu.edu.au/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=1711006&rubricId=525400&originTool=quicklinks 5/5
Total / 100
Overall Score

Criteria Full Marks High
Distinction
(80-100%)
Distinction
(70-79%)
Credit (60-
60%)
Pass (50-
59%)
Needs
Improveme
nt (0-49%)
Criterion
Score
Sources
and
referenci
ng – Use
of APA
7th Ed.
(LO 4)
10 points
Full Marks
(10 Points)
/ 10 9 points
In-text
references
are
appropriat
e and
accurate.
References
are
relevant,
credible,
complete
and
accurate,
complying
with APA
(7th ed).
(8.0 – 9.9
Points)
7.5 points
In-text
references
are
appropriat
e and
accurate.
Referencin
g is
complete,
complying
with APA
(7th ed.)
on most
occasions
with
minimal
errors
only.
(7.0 – 7.9
Points)
6.5 points
In-text
references
are mostly
appropriat
e and
mostly
complete.
Referencin
g is mainly
complete
and
accurate,
generally
complying
with APA
(7th ed.)
with
occasional
errors.
(6.0 – 6.9
Points)
5.5 points
In-text
references
are mostly
appropriat
e. Some
sources
are not
present in
text, or
missing
from the
reference
list.
Inconsiste
ntly
applies,
with APA
(7th ed.)
with some
errors.
(5.0 – 5.9
Points)
2.5 points
In-text
references
are absent
or
incomplete
. R
eferencin
g is
incomplete
or unclear,
with many
inaccuraci
es and
does not
comply
with APA
(7th ed.).
(0.0 – 4.9
Points)

Full
Marks
(100%)
100 points
minimum
High Distinction
(80% and above)
80 points minimum
Distinction
(70% – 79%)
70 points
minimum
Credit
(60% –
69%)
60 points
minimum
Pass
(50% –
59%)
50 points
minimum
Needs
Improvement
(below 50%)
0 points minimum