Assessment Information
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material
in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection
under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a
registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
Assessment 3 Information
Subject Code: | MBA653 |
Subject Name: | Destination and Visitor Management |
Assessment Title: Assessment Type: Length: |
Reflective Summary Individual written reflection 6 pages (no more) |
Weighting: | 40% |
Total Marks: Submission: |
100 Online |
Due Date: | Week 13 |
.
Your task
Individually, you are required to compose a 6-page reflective summary of your personal
development journey as the result of studying this subject, interacting with your peers during
workshop activities, and the group role-play activity, completing your forum discussion
questions, and studying weekly resources.
Assessment Description
The purpose of this individual assignment is to foster students’ ability to discuss and reflect on the
main aspects of destination and visitor management through concept mapping of their personal
learning experiences. This will enable students to showcase their ability to be active learners by
reflecting on visitor and destination management theories and concepts covered in weeks 1 to 12.
More importantly, this reflective summary will allow students to practise their personal development
concept mapping skills, which are necessary in today’s business world.
Assessment Instructions
For an optimum outcome, the reflective summary should be started at the beginning of week one
and continued throughout at least weekly. The key questions that you should ask yourself are:
➢ How have your learning experiences and the significant knowledge and skills you have
developed during this subject affected you?
Reflection requires you to observe, describe and make meaning of experiences closely. Whereas
critical reflection requires you to take one step further. It requires you to analyse, reconsider and
question your learning experiences by relating them to your previous knowledge and skills. Based
on this, you can decide on changes (improvements) in your future personal development as a leader
in the tourism and hospitality sector.
In preparing this summary, you will need to write a detailed critical reflection of the following aspects:
• Your view of destination and visitor management practices before entering MBA653.
• Your goal of entering MBA653 about the subject matter.
• Your reflection on what you have learnt about destination and visitor management during
MBA653.
• The destination and visitor management areas that have interested you the most and why.
• Make proposals on developing yourself further in your professional career.
• Other aspects you have reflected on that are not included above.
Assessment Information
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material
in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection
under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a
registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
Additionally, you are required to create a concept map of your personal development as a
summative ending to your critical reflection. This map should be included as an appendix at the end
of your reflective summary. For those of you who are unfamiliar with concept mapping, please read
the following exert:
“What is a concept map, and what does it look like? A concept map:
• is a way of organising and representing knowledge in the form of a diagram showing
the relationships between concepts;
• reveals concepts, usually represented as boxes or circles, which relate to labelled
arrows in a hierarchical structure; and
• has arrows labelled with short phrases such as ‘is’, ‘leads to’, ‘gives rise to’, ‘results in’,
‘is required by’, or ‘contributes to’, etc.”
*Personal Development Planning Concept Map Example
Adopted from: Jankowska, M 2010, Concept mapping – a reflective tool in Personal Development Planning, ALT Journal, retrieved 13
January 2019 http://eprints.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/1179/1/Concept%20mapping.pdf
In this reflective summary, you are required to reference any sources used in accordance with the
Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style. These sources must be presented in the form of in-text citations
and a reference list at the end of your reflective summary. Wikipedia and other ‘popular’ sites are
not to be used. Please note that the concept map is not included in this submission page limit.
Assessment Information
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material
in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection
under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a
registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
Assessment Submission
This file must be submitted as a ‘Word’ document to avoid any technical issues that may occur from
incorrect file format upload. Uploaded files with a virus will not be considered as a legitimate
submission. MyKBS will notify you if there is an issue with the submitted file. In this case, you must
contact your workshop facilitator via email and provide a brief description of the problem and a
screenshot of the MyKBS error message. You are also encouraged to submit your work well before the
deadline to avoid any possible delay involving the Turnitin similarity report or other technical difficulties.
Late assignment submission penalties
Penalties will be imposed on late assignment submissions in accordance with Kaplan Business School
“late assignment submission penalties” policy.
Number of days |
Penalty |
1* – 9 days | 5% per day for each calendar day late deducted from the total marks available |
10 – 14 days | 50% deducted from the total marks available. |
After 14 days | Assignments that are submitted more than 14 calendar days after the due date will not be accepted, and the student will receive a mark of zero for the assignment(s). |
Note | Notwithstanding the above penalty rules, assignments will also be given a mark of zero if they are submitted after assignments have been returned to students |
*Assignments submitted at any stage within the first 24 hours after the deadline will be considered to be
one day late and therefore subject to the associated penalty
For more information, please read the full policy via https://www.kbs.edu.au/about-us/school-policies
Assessment Information
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material
in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection
under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a
registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
Important Study Information
Academic Integrity Policy
KBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences of
cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy.
What is academic integrity and misconduct?
What are the penalties for academic misconduct?
What are the late penalties?
How can I appeal my grade?
Click here for answers to these questions:
https://www.kbs.edu.au/about-us/school-policies
Page Limits for Written Assessments
Submissions that exceed the page limit will cease to be marked from the point at which that limit is
exceeded.
Study Assistance
Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisor or refer to the
resources on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Click here for this information.
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further
reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86
098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
MBA653 Assessment 3 Marking Rubric –Reflective Summary 40%
Marking Criteria (__/100) |
F (Fail) 0 – 49% |
P (Pass) 50 – 64% |
C (Credit) 65 – 74% |
D (Distinction) 75 – 84% |
HD (High Distinction) 85 – 100% |
Critical Reflection __/60 marks |
You provided an unclear and/or incoherent statement of your views at the start of the subject. |
You provided a brief statement of your views at the start of the subject, though further clarity and logic would have enhanced your statement. |
You provided a clear statement of your views at the start of the subject, though further logic would have enhanced your statement. |
You provided a clear and logical statement of your views at the start of the subject with a clear and logical explanation for these views. |
You provided a clear, logical and insightful statement of your views at the start of the subject with a clear, logical and insightful explanation for these views. |
Your reflection vaguely considers interactions with your peers during workshop activities, collaborative work in the role-play activity, forum discussions, and weekly resources. |
Your reflection partially considers interactions with your peers during workshop activities, collaborative work in the role play activity, forum discussions, and weekly resources. |
Your reflection mostly considers interactions with your peers during workshop activities, collaborative work in the role-play activity, forum discussions, and weekly resources. |
Your reflection considers interactions with your peers during workshop activities, collaborative work in the role-play activity, forum discussions, and weekly resources |
Your critical reflection considers interactions with your peers during workshop activities, collaborative work in the role-play activity, forum discussions, and weekly resources |
|
You have vaguely analysed, reconsidered and questioned some of your learning experiences in this subject, with an unclear link between views stated at the start of the subject and to current and/or future roles and in a workplace. |
You have analysed, reconsidered and questioned some of your learning experiences in this subject, by relating these to views stated at the start of the subject and to current and/or future roles and in a workplace. |
You have analysed, reconsidered and questioned most of your learning experiences in this subject, by clearly relating these to views stated at the start of the subject and to current and/or future roles and in a workplace |
You have thoroughly analysed, reconsidered and questioned learning experiences in this subject, by clearly, and logically relating these to views stated at the start of the subject and to current and/or future roles and in a workplace. |
You have thoroughly and insightfully analysed, reconsidered and questioned learning experiences in this subject, by clearly, logically and insightfully relating these to views stated at the start of the subject and to current and/or future roles in a workplace. |
|
Concept Mapping __/15 marks |
Your concept map lacks focus and/or organises and represents minimal or none of your knowledge. |
Your concept map is focused – it organises and represents some of your knowledge. |
Your concept map is focused – it organises and represents most of your knowledge. |
Your concept map is focused – it organises and represents your knowledge. |
Your concept map is extensive and focused – it organises and represents your knowledge well. |
Grammar/Spelling __/5 marks |
Consistent errors in spelling and grammar impact the flow and readability of your proposal. |
Though there are some grammar and spelling errors, these do not detract from the readability and flow of your proposal. |
Mostly correct grammar and spelling with errors that do not impact the readability and flow of your proposal. |
Errors in grammar and spelling are rare, enhancing the readability and flow of your proposal. |
Perfect grammar and spelling throughout, with excellent readability and flow of your proposal. |
Composition __/5 marks |
Ideas/themes have not been developed. |
Ideas/themes have been developed, but your composition lacks connections and integration. |
Ideas/themes have been developed, but connections are not always obvious. |
Your statements have a logical connection, adding to your reflection’s readability and credibility. |
There is an evident and logical connection between your statements, enhancing your reflection’s structure, synthesis, credibility, and readability. |
Format __/5 marks |
The format chosen for your proposal is inappropriate and/or lacks thought and consideration for the intended audience. |
The format chosen for your proposal is appropriate, but further attention to detail would improve its presentation. |
The format chosen for your proposal is appropriate, but minor changes would enhance its presentation. |
Your proposal is professionally presented and has been submitted in the appropriate format. |
Your proposal is professionally presented and suitable for the intended audience. |
In-text citations and referencing __/10 marks |
Neither in-text referencing nor reference list adheres to Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style. |
In-text referencing or the resultant reference list adheres to Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style but with several errors. |
Both in-text referencing and the resultant reference list adhere to Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style but with several errors |
Both in-text referencing and the resultant reference list adhere to Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style but with only occasional minor errors. |
Both in-text referencing and the resultant reference list adhere strictly to Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style, with no errors. |
Feedback will be released via MyKBS |