definition, justification, aim and objectives/

BUSN20019: ASSIGNMENT 2 INDIVIDUAL Project Report Enter name and student number Criteria Max Mark Fail (0-49%) Pass (50-64%) Credit (65-74%) Distinction (75-84%) High Distinction (85-100%) 1. Title, background, definition, justification, aim and objectives/RQs 10 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic Title, background, definition & justification present; may be inconsistent but generally presented in an effective manner Title, background, definition & justification present; may be slightly inconsistent but generally presented in a convincing manner Title, background, definition & justification present; generally consistent and presented in a highly competent manner Title, background, definition & justification present; ALL are consistent and presented in a superior manner 2.Critical literature review 20 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic Effective review of a limited amount of suitable literature; effective structure; may be overly descriptive Convincing review of an acceptable amount of suitable literature; well structured; may not be critical throughout Highly competent review of a justifiably good amount of suitable literature; very well structured; generally critical and may clearly identify gaps to be addressed Superior review of a justifiably good amount of suitable literature; excellent structure; critical throughout; clearly identifies gaps to be addressed 3. Methodology 15 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Incomplete OR insufficiently presented Effective presentation of how the secondary material was identified and analysed; identification or analysis may be very superficial; basic methodological literature may be included Convincing presentation of how the secondary material was identified and analysed; both identification and analysis are addressed more than superficially Highly competent presentation of how the secondary material was identified and analysed; both identification and analysis are addressed in detail; some methodological literature included Superior presentation of how the secondary material was identified and analysed; both identification and analysis are addressed in detail to enable replication; excellent integration of methodological literature 4. Findings 15 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Incomplete OR insufficiently presented Effective presentation of findings; structure may be illogical, findings may not be fully consistent with aim and objectives/RQs and/or secondary sources may not be fully referenced Convincingpresentation of findings; logical structure, generally consistent with aim and objectives/RQs and secondary sources are generally referenced Highly competentpresentation of findings; very good structure; consistent with aim and objectives/RQs and secondary sources may not be fully referenced Superior presentation of findings; excellent structure; fully consistent with aim and objectives/RQs; excellent integration of fully referenced secondary sources 5. Discussion 15 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Incomplete OR insufficiently presented Effective discussion of findings with reference to the literature reviewed; incomplete discussion and/or illogical structure and/or may not be fully consistent; uncritical Convincing discussion of findings with reference to the literature reviewed; complete discussion and logical structure; generally consistent; may lack criticality Highly competent and generally critical discussion of findings in light of the literature reviewed; complete discussion and logical structure; consistent Superior and critical discussion of findings in light of the literature reviewed; complete discussion and logical structure; highly consistent 6. Introduction and conclusion 10 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic Effective and reasonably clear introduction and conclusion; may ignore aspects of recommendation, limitation or further research; uncritical Convincing and clear introduction and conclusion; considers recommendation, limitation and further research; may lack criticality Highly competent and clear introduction and conclusion; integrates consistent recommendation, limitation and further research; generally critical Superior introduction and conclusion; excellent integration of consistent recommendation, limitation and further research; critical throughout 6. Written communication, referencing and evidence of tutor engagement* *Tutor engagement is evidenced by attaching the logbook as an appendix; failure to submit this appendix will result in a maximum mark of 14.5 in this criterion 15 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Poorly articulated and/or no demonstrated understanding of referencing & the quality of sources and/or no evidence of tutor engagement Effectively communicates ideas; demonstrates an acceptable understanding of referencing & the quality of sources; evidence of engaging with the tutor oncesince submission of the proposal Convincingly communicates ideas; demonstrates a good understanding of referencing & the quality of sources; evidence of engaging with the tutor oncesince submission of the proposal Highly competently communicates ideas; demonstrates a very good understanding of referencing & the quality of sources; evidence of engaging with the tutor at least twice since submission of the proposal Communicates ideas in a superior manner; demonstrates an excellent understanding of referencing & the quality of sources; evidence of engaging with the tutor at least twice since submission of the proposal Moderation Additional comments: Late submission penalty (if applicable) Total Mark 100

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *