Page 1 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material
in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright
protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098
181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
Assessment 2 Information

Subject Code:	MBA502
Subject Name:	Emotional Intelligence, Cultural Intelligence and Diversity
Assessment Title:	Assessment 2
Assessment Type:	Individual Presentation – seven-minute video
Weighting:	30%
Total Marks:	30
Submission:	Via Turnitin
Due Date:	Monday of Week 10

Your Task
Your task is to prepare a video presentation.
Assessment Description
This is an individual assignment.
You are required to conduct secondary research on a local Australian-based or international
firm to highlight how it embraces just one form of diversity. You can focus on cultural diversity
or any other form (gender, sexual orientation, age, disability, etc.). The main focus of your video
presentation should be to highlight and critique your chosen firm by presenting issues related to
how it manages that specified diversity.
Assessment Instructions
In your video, it is recommended that you include the following:
A personal introduction: who are you?
An overview of the firm: what does it do and why did you select it?
Its diversity-related initiatives: what are they?
Sources: from where have you obtained this information?
A critique of the diversity initiatives: have they been successful?
Recommendations: what else could the firm do in relation to diversity?
Additional sources: on what basis are you making those recommendations?
You will need to submit your file via the link provided on Turnitin.
Page 2 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material
in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright
protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098
181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
Important Study Information
Academic Integrity Policy
KBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences
of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct
Policy.
What is academic integrity and misconduct?
What are the penalties for academic misconduct?
What are the late penalties?
How can I appeal my grade?
Click here for answers to these questions:
http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/.
Word Limits for Written Assessments
Submissions that exceed the word limit by more than 10% will cease to be marked from the point
at which that limit is exceeded.
Study Assistance
Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisor or refer to the
resources on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Click here for this information.
Page 3 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the
Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan
Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
Assessment Marking Guide

Criteria	F (Fail) 0%–49%	P (Pass) 50%–64%	CR (Credit) 65%–74%	D (Distinction) 75%–84%	HD (High Distinction) 85%–100%	Mark
Assessment Content (Subject specific) OUT OF 30 MARKS
Video Component (Submitted via Turnitin) OUT OF 30 MARKS for online students or for Power Point slides for face-to-face students
Logos (clarity and logic of the arguments presented)	The presentation of issues and recommendations is neither clear nor logically compelling.	Persuasiveness of presentation suffers from somewhat vague and shaky argumentation.	The arguments presented are somewhat clear but could have been logically more compelling.	The arguments presented are clear and logically compelling.	The arguments presented are very clear and logically compelling.	/10
Ethos (credibility of the presenters)	No effort was made to establish the credibility of the presenters.	Some limited effort was made to establish the credibility of the presenters. The effort was not very effective.	The presenter made a good effort to establish their credibility but there is some room for improvement, either in the character or competence dimensions.	The presenter did a very good job of establishing their credibility.	The presenter did an excellent job of establishing their credibility (character and competence).	/10
Pathos (appeal to the audience)	The presenter failed to consider the needs and feelings of their targeted audience. The audience was disengaged most of the time.	The presenter made a feeble attempt to consider the needs and feelings of their targeted audience. The audience was sometimes disengaged.	The presenter made a good effort to consider the needs and feelings of their targeted audience but with little impact.	The presenter’s way of communicating was effective, as they addressed the needs and feelings of their targeted audience with very good responses.	The presenter’s way of communicating was very effective and addressed the needs and feelings of their targeted audience with great responses from audience.	/10
Comments