Traditionally, group therapy is always conducted in person. The effects of a group of people suffering from the same issues, sitting in a circle with or without a professional facilitator to talk about similar struggles cannot be underestimated. Clinicians who practise group therapy have generated publications on the efficacies of group programmes in treating a myriad of human life issues.
Yalom and proponents went on to identify therapeutic factors that have undeniable positive effects that facilitate change. Many of the studies that involved groups were Ir in-person. It is widely-accepted knowledge that groups conducted in-person can produce a significant therapeutic impact on members to effect positive change.”
However, the world has taken a change when the Covid-19 pandemic struck. Safety measures and keeping distance were the key approaches to ensure safety. Together with the progress in technology advancement, group therapy during the endemic time had to adapt to the new norm of keeping safe distancing.
Thus, the new — — The rationale of converting group therapy from an in-person setting to an online platform was created not only for reasons of keeping members safe but also out of necessity as travelling to gather in the same premises was no longer a feasible option.
Organisations around the world began to convert their regular group programmes to online platforms. It is now a common trend to see groups or training programmes being conducted online. As the world began to ease up on restrictions, in-person group programmes may slowly re-commence in the near future.
It is an interesting era to compare the differences between online group programmes versus traditional group settings. You are to conduct a literature review on the comparison between online groups and groups in-person. In your literature review, describe the findings and state clearly the advantages and limitations of both online groups and groups in person. In your essay, critically examine and discuss your findings. Substantiate your evidence with sound literature referencing, and provide critical evaluations on the differences between the two.