authentic without oversharing

Be Yourself, but Carefully
How to be authentic without oversharing
by Lisa Rosh and Lynn Offermann
h flj uthenticity” is the new buzzword
â among leaders today. We’re told to
‘ %bring ourfijUselves to the office,
engage in frank conversations, and to
tell personal stories as
a way ofgaining our
colleagues’ trust and improving group performance. Therisein collaborative workplaces and dynamic teams over recent
years has only heightened the demand
for “instant intimacy,” and m2magers are
supposed to set an example.
But the honest sharing ofthoughts,
feelings, and experiences at work is a
double-edged sword:
Despite its potential
benefits, self-disclosure
can backfire if
it’s hastily conceived, poorly timed, or
inconsistent with cultural or organizational norms—hurting your reputation,
alienating employees, fostering distrust,
and hindering teamwork. Getting it right
takes a deft touch, for leaders at any stage
oftheir careers.
Consider Mitch, the director ofa
newly established department at a major
U.S. university, who was responsible for
negotiating and maintaining links with
other educational and research institutions. Attempting to break the ice in his
first meeting with the dean of a prominent college, he mentioned how excited
October aoi3 Harvard Business Review 135
he was to be at the dean’s school, because
he’d wanted to attend it but had been
rejected. He got a cold stare in response,
and the meeting ended without an
agreement. Mitch thought his comment
was friendly and self-deprecating; now
he realizes that it probably lowered his
standing with the dean, who may have
thought he was either challenging the
admissions process or seeking pity. Mitch
learned that such revelations must be
skillfully deployed.
In our years of studying and consulting on leadership development, team
building, and communication skills, we’ve
come across hundreds ofcases like this.
Drawing on them and on more than four
decades’ worth ofresearch in social and
organizational psychology, we now have
some lessons to share. Here we look at the
common mistakes executives make when
they’re trying to be authentic and offer
afive-stepplan for moving toward moreefFective self-disclosure.
Where Leaders Slip
Authenticity begins with self-awareness:
knowing who you are—your values,
emotions, and competencies—and how
you’re perceived by others. Only then
can you know what to reveal and when.
Good communication skills are also key to
effective self-disclosure; your stories are
worthwhile only ifyou can express them
well. We typically encounter three types of
executives whose lack of self-knowledge
causes their revelations to fall flat—oblivious leaders, bumblers, and open books—
and two types who fail because they are
poor communicators: inscrutable leaders
and social engineers. (However, people
oftenfitinto more thcin one category at
least some ofthe time.)
Oblivious leaders don’t have a realistic view ofthemselves and thus reveal
information and opinions in a manner that
appears clueless or phony. Take Lori, the
director ofsales and business development for a global software company. She
sees herself as an inclusive, participatory,
and team-oriented manager and likes to
136 Harvard Business Review October 2013
tell Stories about her time as a junior staff
member and how much she valued having
a voice in decisions. But her subordinates
consider her to be highly directive and
thusfindher anecdotes disingenuous. As
one employee puts it, “I don’t care ifyou
make every decision, but don’t pretend to
care about my opinion.”
Bumblers have a better understanding
ofwho they are but not ofhow they come
across to others. Unable to read colleagues’
social cues, including body language and
facial expressions, they make ill-timed, inappropriate disclosures or opt out ofrelationship building altogether. This behavior
is particularly prevalent in cross-cultural
situations when people aren’t attuned to
differing social norms. A case in point involves Roger, a partner in a multinational
consultingfirmwho was assigned to help
boost meirket share for thefirm’snewly
formed Asia-Pacific office. Asked to coach
a team that had recently lost an important account, he decided to share a story
about losing hisfirstclient. In the United
States, anecdotes about his own mistakes
had always made his subordinates feel
better. But Roger’s Asian colleagues were
dismayed that their new leader would risk
his honor, reputation, and influence by
admitting weakness.
You don’t need to leave your country to
bumble. Take Anne, the general manager
ofa cafeteria for an international technology company. An extrovert who knows
herself well, she shares her experiences
and perceptions freely. This can be effective when she’s talking to her staff, but it’s
less so with outsiders. For example, when
an HR manager recently complimented
her on the catering she’d coordinated
for an in-house awards ceremony, Anne
thanked him and went on to disclose that
she’d been concerned because the company had come close to outsourcing its
food service. Instead ofseizing an opportunity to secure more internal business for
her beleaguered cafeteria, she diminished
her status and worried team members
who overheard the exchange.
Unable to read
social cues,
including body
language and
facial expressions,
make ill-timed,

Open books talk endlessly about themselves, about others, about everything;
they’re too comfortable communicating.
So although colleagues may seek them out
as sources ofinformation, they ultimately
don’t trust them. Consider Jeremy, an
outgoing senior manager with a sharp
mind but a string offailed management
consulting engagements. When people
first meet him, his warmth, intelligence,
and ability to draw them into conversation make them feel as ifhe were an old
friend. But his aggressive familiarity soon
wears thin (“I know more about his wife
than I know about my own,” one former
colleague says), and his bosses question
whether he’s discreet enough for client
work. Indeed, Jeremy was asked to leave
his most recent job after he used a key
meeting with a prospective client to detail
work he’d done for several others, not only
outlining their problems but identifying
them by name.
Inscrutable leaders are at the other
end ofthe spectmm: They have difficulty
sharing anything about themselves in the
workplace, so they come off as remote ¿ind
inaccessible and can’t create long-term
office relationships. Aviva is a registered
dietician who expanded her private practice into a full-service nutritional guidance,
exercise training, and health products
company. Although she’s talented and
passionate, she has difficulty retaining
employees, because she fails to communicate her enthusiasm and long-term vision.
Recently featured on a panel of female
entrepreneurs, she opted to present a
basic annual report and outline her sales
strategy rather than to captivate the
audience with a personal story, as others
had done. Afterward, the other panelists
werefloodedwith résumés and business
cards; Aviva had lost out on the significant
benefits that can come from appropriate
Finally, social engineers aie similar to
inscmtable leaders in that they don’t instinctively share, and to bumblers in that
they often have difficulty reading social
cues, but their chief shortcoming is the
way they encourage self-disclosure within
their work groups. Instead ofmodeling
desired behaviors, they sponsor external
activities such as off-site team buuding.
Andrew, for example, is a unit head at a
financial servicesfirmwith an ultracompetitive corporate culture. Every year, he
sends his team on a mandatory retreat run
by an outside consultant who demands
personal revelations in artificial settings.
Yet Andrew never models or encourages
self-disclosure in the office—and he looks
the other way ifemployees exploit colleagues’ self-revealed weaknesses to get
ahead. When we asked one ofAndrew’s
direct reports about the most recent group
getaway, she said, “I learned that I hate my
colleagues—and my manager—even more
than I thought.”
Executives who make any or all of
these mistakes may appear to be simply
incompetent. But their cautionary tales
are much more common than you might
think, and we can all learn from them. In
our work we’ve seen even the most selfaware, talented communicators err in how,
when, or to whom they reveal a personal
story. Everyone should understand best
practices in self-disclosure.
A Five-Step Path
Let’s retum to Mitch, who blimdered
with the college dean. Chastened by
that experience, he vowed to get better
at revelation. Since then his disclosures
have proved far more effective, allowing
him to establish many enduring partnerships. What makes him so successful now?
First, he’s self-aware: He knows who he
is, where he came from, where he’s going,
and what he believes in. He encourages
colleagues to give him feedback, and he’s
enrolled in several developmental training
programs. Second, he communicates
cautiously, letting the task at hand, along
vwth environmental cues, dictate what
to reveal when. For instance, he was all
business at one meeting with a potential
partner until she voiced a concem about
whether her students could assimilate at
his university. Sensing a critical moment
in the negotiation, he decided to tell her
the challenges he’d faced in an
exchange program during college—trying to learn another language, make
friends, and
adjust to the curriculum. The
story was personal and heartfelt but also
an understanding ofhis
counterpart’s concem and a commitment
to addressing it. He deepened the relationship and sealed the deal.
Mitch arrived
at effective, authentic
by followingfivesteps:
1abou bu lici Buil knowledge ttth hones dt yoursel a ebes foundatio ttfeedback—ideall approac . Yo f inuman ca nho n ilea yfsways self tmo so y,
a 360-degree review—from coworkers and
follow it up
with coaching. In Why Should
Anyone Be Led by You? (Harvard Business School Press, 2006), Rob Goffee and
Gareth Jones suggest exploring biography.
You might consider your upbringing, your
work experiences, and new situations,
such as volunteer opportunities, that test
your comfort zone and force you to reflect
on your values. You might also consider
your personal management philosophy
and the events and people who shaped it.
We start our executive coaching engagements with a detailed interview that
walks clients through their
personal and professional histories, their
successes and failures, and the lessons
they’ve drawn
as a result. These exercises
can help you choose which stories
most appropriate to share with others.
2Conside task choos an furthe dtiming . Skillfu er th threerelevanc substance tas olf self-discloser revelation k at hand e,tprocess o,sno th toste ,
to promote themselves or
create purely
personal relationships. In fact, we found
in our earlier work that team development efforts often fail because they try
too hard to foster intimacy rather than
focusing on task-relevant disclosure and
social cohesion. Be clear that your
gocd in
October 2013 Harvard Business Review 137
When—and When Not—to Share
This checklist can help you decide when
self-disclosure is advisable.
revealing yourself at work is to buud trust
and engender better collaboration
teamwork, not to make
that may happen. So before you share personal information, ask yourself whether
will help you do your job. Is it germane
to the situation?
Will your staff get a better understanding ofyour thinking and
rationale? Ifnot, you might want to save
the story for a coffee date with friends.
Ifyour goal is simply to develop rapport
with employees, you canfindsafer ways
to accomplish that—such as bonding over
a beloved sports team,
a new movie, or a
favorite restaurant.
3Thi wbu fabricat Kee ethea swe’r pshoul revelation reabou etales amaze d bte.manager Tak a no-brainer dsagenuine et ho Allan ws wh ofte , wh ,.ono
stepped down from his position
as the
associate director ofmarketing and
communications for a regional hotel chain.
In both presentations
and small group
discussions, he would cite examples of
how he had successfully used social media,
video on demand, and search engine optimization in his prior position at a premier
hotel. The problem was that he
held thatjob in the early 1980s, before
those technologies were widespread.
did have extensive social media marketing
experience, but
it had come through his
volunteer church work; he fudged the details in an effort to bond with his younger
colleagues. Eventually they found out,
and Allan lost credibility, which ultimately
led to
his departure from the company.
Making up stories or exaggerating
parts of
a narrative
tofitthe situation may seem
like a good idea, but it is easily discovered
and can do a lot ofharm. Instead try to
real ifless-than-perfect disclosures
still capture the emotions ofthe situation and convey empathy. If, for example,
Mitch had never been part ofan exchange
he might have told his potential
partner that he was a father and therefore
recognized the
importance ofassuaging
young people’s fears in new situations.
For an interactive
version of this
tool, with tailored
advice, go to
How much self-reñection
have you done?
A I don’t engage in self-reflection.
B I’ve taken many self-assessment tests but rarely get feedback from others.
C I’ve completed numerous self-assessments, and my scores
are usually similar to those my colleagues give me in
360-degree reviews.
What is your goal in
A I want to demonstrate knowledge, competence, or empathy.
B I want to connect with my colleagues in order to improve the
atmosphere at work.
C I want
to gain the trust of my colleagues in order to make
our performance more effective.
What kinds of information
do you disclose?
A I fabricate a story to fit the situation.
B I tell a
true story that may or may not fit the situation.
C I tell a true story that fits the emotion of the situation
and conveys empathy.
What personal information do
your colleagues share with you?
A No one shares personal information in my workplace.
B I know
a lot about the personal lives of a few friends at work
but not much about my other
C My colleagues share personal information, especially when it
is pertinent to the task.
How long have you known
your colleagues?
A We just met.
B We’ve had one or two formal meetings.
C We’ve
had at least a week of formal and informal discussions
and have completed one significant task.
If your answers were mostly As, you might want to be quiet.
If they were mostly Bs, you should proceed cautiously.
If they were mostly Cs, speak up.
October 2013 Harvard Business Review 138
4text tiona ha individualisti Understan s show . Considerabl l anndtha cultura d th ctsocieties peopl e organiza e researc l con e fro , suc mhh
as the United States and India, are more
likely to disclose information about themselves and expect others to do the same
than people from coUectivist societies,
such as China and Japan. Thus Roger’s
Asian teammates
might have been put off
by his readiness to share a personal story.
care agency. Exhausted after a sleepless night with her sick baby, she shared
that experience in her introduction, to
the discomfort of her audience. “They
wanted to know about my education and
industry background, and instead I spoke
graphically about baby throw-up,” she recalls. “It took me a few months after that
to reestablish credibility.” This doesn’t
mean you have to wait years before telling
colleagues anything about your personal
life. You just need to have spent enough
Skillful self-disclosers choose the
substance, process, and timing of
revelations to further the task at
hand, not to promote themselves.
regardless ofits content. Make an effort
to investigate national and orgjinizational
norms about sharing so that you’ll know
when it’s best to keep quiet. In any context, but especially one new
to you that
involves teammates
from other countries,
companies, or functions, you should talk
to respected insiders about how people
and what level ofcandor is expected. HR personnel and group leaders
may be able to
provide this information,
you can also test the waters with taskrelevant self-disclosure to see how people
respond. And you can look for cues such
eye contact and others’ attempts to
share or solicit stories.
5strengthen don’ to disclosures Dela o muc tyestablis orhavoi persona relationships .hIntimat dthem ver l informatio y. Sharin persona e storie ; the gsynl
too quickly breaks all sociocultural norms
ofbehavior, making one appear awkward, needy, or even unstable. That was
Helen’s mistake when she was asked to
introduce herself at the cross-site launch
of a training program at her home health
time with them to develop a foundation
oftrust and to learn organizational norms.
First develop common objectives, delineate goals and roles, and demonstrate
credibility and trustworthiness through
your work. Take careful note ofhow open
others are before offering significant disclosures of your own. In some workplaces
you will eventuallyfindit safe and helpful
to share; in others you’ll realize it’s extremely unwise to do so.
Thesefivesteps should help you
avoid some ofthe pitfalls we’ve outlined
and become a more effective leader.
Remember to think carefully about your
motives and likelihood of success. (See
the exhibit “When—and When Not—to
Share.”) Self-disclosure is a valuable
mcinagerial tool, but it must be used
judiciously. What stories do you have to
tell, and who needs to hear them?
HBR Reprint R1310J
Lisa Rosh is an assistant professor of
management at the Sy Syms School of
Business at Yeshiva University.
Lynn Offermann
is a professor of organizational sciences and
communication at the George Washington
^’v 9 m m ±m ^ “^
HKUST’s open-enrollment and
custom programs
w\ advance
your global business knowledge
and help you become a promising
business leader in Asia
for the world
Ä « t a À M
Copyright 2013 Harvard Business Publishing. All Rights Reserved. Additional restrictions
may apply including the use of this content as assigned course material. Please consult your
institution’s librarian about any restrictions that might apply under the license with your
institution. For more information and teaching resources from Harvard Business Publishing
including Harvard Business School Cases, eLearning products, and business simulations
please visit