Assessment

Assessment component 1
by Sai Rohit Potabattula
Submission date: 09-Mar-2022 03:38PM (UTC+0000)
Submission ID: 173021276
File name: 119217_Sai_Rohit_Potabattula_Assessment_component_1_1935630_25961985.pdf (654.34K)
Word count: 1530
Character count: 7344
Introduction – 19/30 Results –
10/40 Discussion – 7/30
not clear phrasing

This is a lot of background information that perhaps
could have been edited down
This could be a little clearer
peptide

You should not really use a paired sample t test for data of this nature. Survival curves normally
require Kaplan Meier

This doesn’t really illustrate the survival terribly well when comparing to other
groups.
Again, this is really
difficult for the reader to
interpret.

2 3
This is
where you
should
provide a
description
of the data
not go into
hypotheses
or
mechanism
You should put the control groups on here?
How is this relevant

1
4
In terms of discussion, the structure is not appropriate and should
place the data in the context of the external literature.

3%
SIMILARITY INDEX
2%
INTERNET SOURCES
3%
PUBLICATIONS
2%
STUDENT PAPERS
1 1%
2 1%
3 1%
4 <1%
Assessment component 1
ORIGINALITY REPORT
PRIMARY SOURCES
libmast.utm.my
Internet Source
www.karger.com
Internet Source
Krisna Moorthi Periyasamy, Uma Devi
Ranganathan, Srikanth Prasad Tripathy,
Ramalingam Bethunaickan. “Vitamin D – A
host directed autophagy mediated therapy
for tuberculosis”, Molecular Immunology,
2020
Publication
Li, Can, Chuangen Li, Anna J. X. Zhang, Kelvin
K. W. To, Andrew C. Y. Lee, Houshun Zhu,
Hazel W. L. Wu, Jasper F. W. Chan, Honglin
Chen, Ivan F. N. Hung, Lanjuan Li, and KwokYung Yuen. “Avian Influenza A H7N9 Virus
Induces Severe Pneumonia in Mice without
Prior Adaptation and Responds to a
Combination of Zanamivir and COX-2
Inhibitor”, PLoS ONE, 2014.
Publication
Exclude quotes Off
Exclude bibliography On
Exclude matches Off
FINAL GRADE
36/100
Assessment component 1
GRADEMARK REPORT
GENERAL COMMENTS
Instructor
PAGE 1
Text Comment. Introduction – 19/30 Results – 10/40 Discussion – 7/30
Text Comment. not clear phrasing
PAGE 2
Text Comment. This is a lot of background information that perhaps could have been
edited down
Text Comment. This could be a little clearer
Text Comment. peptide
PAGE 3
Text Comment. You should not really use a paired sample t test for data of this nature.
Survival curves normally require Kaplan Meier
PAGE 4
Text Comment. This doesn’t really illustrate the survival terribly well when comparing to
other groups.
Text Comment. Again, this is really difficult for the reader to interpret.
PAGE 5
PAGE 6
Text Comment. This is where you should provide a description of the data not go into
hypotheses or mechanism
Text Comment. You should put the control groups on here?
Text Comment. How is this relevant
PAGE 7
Text Comment. In terms of discussion, the structure is not appropriate and should place
the data in the context of the external literature.