| MGT5PMT: Assessment 2 marking rubric | |||||
| CRITERIA | Excellent (> 80 %) | Very good (70 – 79%) | Good (60 – 69%) | Acceptable (50 – 59%) | Unacceptable (<50%) |
| Project Budget (30% of total mark) |
☐ Excellent project budget, appropriate for this case study. Includes details and justifications of all assumptions made. (24-30 marks) |
☐ Very good project budget, appropriate for this case study. Includes details and appropriate justifications of most assumptions made. (21-23 marks) |
☐ Good project budget, appropriate for this case study. Includes good details and relevant justifications for many assumptions made. (18-20 marks) |
☐ Acceptable project budget, appropriate for this case study. Includes adequate details and applicable justifications for some assumptions made. (15-17 marks) |
☐ Poor, unclear or missing project budget. (<15 marks) |
| Project Schedule (30% of total mark) |
☐ Excellent project schedule, appropriate for this case study, detailing the key milestones for project deliverables. Excellent discussion and justification of the methods, tools & techniques chosen. (24-30 marks) |
☐ Very good project schedule, appropriate for this case study, detailing the key milestones for project deliverables. Very good discussion and justification of most of the methods, tools & techniques chosen. (21-23 marks) |
☐ Good project schedule, appropriate for this case study, identifying many key milestones for project deliverables. Good discussion and justification of some of the methods, tools & techniques chosen. (18-20 marks) |
☐ Acceptable project schedule, appropriate for this case study, with some milestones for project deliverables. Acceptable discussion and some justification of the methods, tools & techniques chosen. (15-17 marks) |
☐ Poor, unclear or missing project schedule. (<15 marks) |
| Project Resources (30% of total mark) |
☐ Excellent estimation of the resources required for successful completion of the project, well integrated with the project schedule. Includes clear discussion of the relevant tools and techniques used in estimating resource requirements. (24-30 marks) |
☐ Very good estimation of the resources required for successful completion of the project, including very good integration with the project schedule. Includes very good discussion of the relevant tools and techniques used in estimating resource requirements. (21-23 marks) |
☐ Good estimation of the resources required for successful completion of the project, including good integration with the project schedule. Includes good discussion of the relevant tools and techniques used in estimating resource requirements. (18-20 marks) |
☐ Acceptable estimation of the resources required for successful completion of the project, including some integration with the project schedule. Includes discussion of the relevant tools and techniques used in estimating resource requirements. (15-17 marks) |
☐ Poor, unclear or missing details of resources required (<15 marks) |
| Writing and referencing (10% of total mark) |
☐ Excellent use of relevant and appropriate sources of literature. Correct referencing used throughout. Excellent grammar and spelling. (8-10 marks) |
☐ Very good use of relevant and appropriate sources of literature. Correct referencing, and very good grammar and spelling. (7 marks) |
☐ Good use of relevant and appropriate sources of literature. Mostly correct referencing. Good grammar and spelling. (6 marks) |
☐ Fair use of relevant sources of literature. Some referencing errors. Some grammar and spelling errors. (5 marks) |
☐ Few if any literature sources included and poor standard of referencing. Poor spelling and grammar. (< 5 marks) |